Today I would like to write to you about an interesting betting strategy that has not yet been tested by me personally and is especially displayed in this post for your review with further reflections. First of all, it is suitable for big fans of NHL betting, moreover, it is necessary to bet using this strategy in live mode. Perhaps the strategy will also seem interesting to ordinary users who do not particularly like North American hockey but are interested in all methods of playing the game, which are based on attempts to beat offices on an ongoing basis.
The fact is that all teams in the NHL that lose at the very end of the game by 1 or 2 goals must remove their goalkeeper in an attempt to recoup, replacing him with an additional field hockey player. That is, by such actions, the losing team is trying to achieve some kind of superiority on the hockey rink in the form of the majority of active hockey players, and, at the same time, takes great risks, playing without a goalkeeper. It must be admitted that the choice of the losing team is small: there is nothing to lose, but it is still possible to try to save the match, especially since if it does not work out, then it is easy to find an excuse: they say, they did everything they could. And having conceded a goal into an empty net is stronger than there is, no one will be upset, because the defeat, in 1, in 2, even in 3 goals, in fact, changes absolutely nothing.
Usually, if the team loses the minimum and needs to win only 1 goal, then it removes the goalkeeper 1:30 – 2:00 minutes before the end of the game. If the team loses by 2 goals, then the goalkeeper has to be removed early, namely: 2:30 – 3:30 minutes before the end of the meeting, because one potential puck is not enough for her. It is these game options that I am going to consider as my strategy.
Now let’s move on to the strategy itself … All we need to do is wait for the hockey game, in which one of the opponents, closer to the end of the meeting, will be in front of exactly 1 or 2 goals.
You need to bet that the team that leads the score will no longer be able to score. The fact is that the offices know about the need for the losing team to shoot the goalkeeper, and, a few minutes before the end of the meeting, they give equal chances and quotes on whether the winning team will be able to score more. All offices close the lines during the game without a goalkeeper, which means that it is necessary to read the game moment and be in time to put in moments before it is removed: if one of the opponents leads the score by 2 goals, then such a moment comes in about 3:30 – 4:00 min before the end of the meeting, if only at 1, then approximately 2:30 – 3:00 min. Don’t forget that you need to make the right choice and the office itself, which will allow you to make such bets as long as possible. That is, the most important thing is to be in time to make a bet before the losing team removes the goalkeeper, otherwise, all bets will be suspended.
I am ready to give an example: team A in a match with team B leads the game with a score of 3-1. Exactly 3:30 – 4:00 minutes before the end of the meeting, we need to put on IT teams A less than 3.5. Thus, we will bet that Team A will not be able to score any more in the match. The sense of the strategy is that in such moments of play, in my opinion, despite the possible long time of the losing team’s play without a goalkeeper, the goal of the team that leads the score will often fail rather than take place. Average odds for bets on ITM of such a team 3:30 – 4:00 minutes before the end of the game are approximately 1. 8 – 2.1 depending on the specific team. So, in fact, I would like to figure out what will happen if you play this method at the beginning with just a fixed size of bet … I am ready to analyze a number of extreme NHL matches in which such game moments appeared, and in one of his new posts to present you with a report about what would have come out in practice.
Sorry if the text came out too voluminous, but I tried to convey to you all the subtleties of this strategy in as much detail and accuracy as possible.
Thanks for reading!